Page 364 - dyser_Stankevych

364

453. Biacchi G. R, Basting R. T. Comparison of Fracture Strength of Endocrowns and

Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crowns. Operative Dentistry. 2012. 37(2).

P. 130–136.

454. Fatigue behavior of resin-modified monolithic CAD-CAM RNC crowns and

endocrowns / Rocca G. T., et al. Dental Materials. 2016. 32(12). e338–e350. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.024.

455. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano

ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth / Bankoğlu Güngör M., et al.

Dental Materials. 2017. 36(2). P. 135–141. DOI: http://10.4012/dmj.2016-017 .

456. Bindl A., Lüthy H., Mörnmann W. H. Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic

CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns. Dental Materials. 2006. 22(1). P. 29–36.

457. El-Damanhoury H. M., Haj-Ali R. N., Platt J. A. Fracture Resistance and

Microleakage of Endocrowns Utilizing Three CAD-CAM Blocks. Operative Dentistry.

2014. 40(2). P. 201–210. DOI: http://10.2341/13-143-L.

458. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different
preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials / Lise D. P., et al. Journal of Dentistry.

2017. 59. P. 54–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.007.
459. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and

multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces / Gresnigt M. M.,
et al. Dental Materials. 2016. 32(5). P. 607–614. DOI: http://10.1016/j.den-

tal.2016.01.004.

460. Riera i Jorrin M. Study of the risk of fracture and debonding in a tooth restored

by a post and a composite core and another by an endocrown methodology using FEA.

Universite Catholique de Louvain, 2014. URL: http://upcommons.upc.edu/hand-

le/2099.1/24469 (дата звернення: 05.05.2016).

461. Dejak B., Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with

endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dental Materials. 2013. 29.

P. 309–317.